Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2019 г.

Текст

... st — Rights of defence — Conciliation procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Discrimination on grounds of sex — Maternity leave — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

In Case T‑431/18,

WN, represented by L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Parliament, represented by Í. Ní Riagáin Düro and M. Windisch, acting as Agents,

defendant,

APPLICATION under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 28 September 2017 to terminate the applicant’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant and, secondly, compensation for the non-material damage she allegedly suffered as a result of the Parliament’s conduct,

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber),

composed of S. Gervasoni (Rapporteur), President, L. Madise and R. da Silva Passos, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. On 16 March 2015, the applicant, WN, was recruited by the European Parliament as an accredited parliamentary assistant to assist a Member of the European Parliament (‘the Member concerned’). Under a contract pursuant to Title VII of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘the CEOS’), which is due to expire at the end of the parliamentary term, the applicant was classified in grade 5 in function group I.

2. By a new contract, concluded on 19 January 2016 and terminating the previous contract, the applicant was engaged to perform the same functions, with the same expiry date, and was classified in grade 6 in function group I.

3. By letter ...