Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

In Case T‑328/19,

Scorify UAB, established in Vilnius (Lithuania), represented by V. Viešūnaitė, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Botis and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Scor SE, established in Paris (France), represented by T. de Haan and C. de Callataÿ, lawyers,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2019 (Case R 1639/2018‑4), relating to opposition proceedings between Scor and Scorisk,

THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber),

composed of V. Tomljenović, President, F. Schalin and I. Nõmm (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 29 May 2019,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 23 October 2019,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 21 October 2019,

having regard to the change in the composition of the Chambers of the General Court,

having regard to the reassignment of the case to a new Judge-Rapporteur,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the ...