Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... sing the complaint – Decision rejecting the request for conciliation – Right to be heard – Liability)

In Case T‑757/19,

HB, represented by C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Investment Bank (EIB), represented by G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer,

defendant,

APPLICATION under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the decisions of the EIB of 20 June and 10 October 2019 rejecting, respectively, a complaint of harassment and intimidation, and a request for conciliation, and, second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of those decisions,

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of H. Kanninen, President, N. Półtorak (Rapporteur) and M. Stancu, Judges,

Registrar: X. Lopez Bancalari, Administrator,

having regard to the written part of the procedure and further to the hearing on 5 July 2021,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. The applicant, HB, entered the service of the European Investment Bank (EIB) on 1 February 2011 as an administrative assistant assigned to the department dealing with the Jaspers initiative (‘the department in question’).

2. Under the terms of the contract which she signed on 21 December 2010, the applicant was initially engaged for a period of three years. On 24 July 2013, the applicant’s fixed-term contract was extended by an addendum for a further period of three years, from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2017.

3. ...