Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

In Case T‑677/19,

Polfarmex S.A., established in Kutno (Poland), represented by B. Matusiewicz-Kulig, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by H. O’Neill, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Arkadiusz Kaminski, residing in Etobicoke, Ontario (Canada), represented by E. Pijewska, M. Mazurek and W. Trybowski, lawyers,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2019 (Joined Cases R 1861/2018‑2 and R 1840/2018‑2), relating to revocation proceedings between Polfarmex and Mr Kaminski,

THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber),

composed of V. Tomljenović, President, P. Škvařilová-Pelzl (Rapporteur) and I. Nõmm, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 2 October 2019,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 10 December 2019,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 13 December 2019,

having regard to the reassignment of the case to a new Judge-Rapporteur,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks of service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, ...