Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... tional figurative marks representing a bounding feline – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

In Case T‑510/19,

Puma SE, established in Herzogenaurach (Germany), represented by P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Hanf and S. Hanne, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO being

Gemma Group Srl, established in Cerasolo Ausa (Italy),

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 April 2019 (Case R 2057/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Puma and Gemma Group,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of A. Marcoulli, President, J. Schwarcz and C. Iliopoulos (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: J. Pichon, Administrator,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 17 July 2019,

having regard to the response lodged at the Court Registry on 10 October 2019,

having regard to the written question put by the Court to the parties and their answers to that question lodged at the Court Registry on 5 and 19 May 2020,

further to the hearing on 18 September 2020,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. On 14 February 2013, Gemma Group Srl filed an application for registration of an EU trade mark with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February ...