Дело C-455/11: Solvay/Комисия, Съдебно решение от 5 декември 2013 г.

Текст

... icle 81 EC – Duration of the infringement – Concepts of ‘agreement’ and ‘concerted practice’ – Leniency Notice – Obligation to state reasons – Reduction of the fine)

In Case C‑455/11 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 26 August 2011,

Solvay SA, established in Brussels (Belgium), represented by O. W. Brouwer, advocaat, and M. O’Regan, Solicitor,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being:

European Commission, represented by V. Bottka, A. Biolan and J. Bourke, acting as Agents, and by M. Gray, BL, with an address for service in Luxembourg,

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Second Chamber),

composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, G. Arestis (Rapporteur), J.‑C. Bonichot and A. Arabadjiev, Judges,

Advocate General: M. Wathelet,

Registrar: M. Aleksejev, Administrator,

having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 24 January 2013,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its appeal, Solvay SA (‘Solvay’), seeks to have set aside in part the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T‑186/06 Solvay v Commission [2011] ECR II‑2839 (‘the judgment under appeal’), by which that court dismissed its application for the annulment in part of Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement against Akzo ...