Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2019 г.

Текст

In Case T‑263/18,

Meblo Trade d.o.o., established in Zagreb (Croatia), represented by A. Ivanova, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by E. Markakis and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court, being

Meblo Int, proizvodnja izdelkov za spanje d.o.o., established in Nova Gorica (Slovenia), represented by A. Plesničar, lawyer,

ACTION against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2018 (Case R 883/2017-4), concerning revocation proceedings between Meblo Trade and Meblo Int, proizvodnja izdelkov za spanje,

THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber),

composed of S. Frimodt Nielsen, President, V. Kreuschitz and N. Półtorak (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 26 April 2018,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 7 August 2018,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 3 August 2018,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks of service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute