Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2024 г.

Текст

... earlier word mark Curry King – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 )

In Case T‑157/24,

Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG, established in Edewecht (Germany), represented by S. Russlies, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO being

András Lénárd, residing in Sâncrăieni (Romania),

THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber),

composed, at the time of the deliberations, of P. Škvařilová-Pelzl (Rapporteur), acting as President, I. Nõmm and D. Kukovec, Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG, seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 January 2024 (Case R 376/2023-5) (‘the contested decision’).

Background to the dispute

2. ...