Дело C-71/19: Barata/Парламент, Определение от 26 септември 2019 г.

Текст

... ials — Article 45a — Complaint — Rights of defence — Article 90(2))

In Case C‑71/19 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 30 January 2019,

João Miguel Barata, residing in Evere (Belgium), represented by G. Pandey and D. Rovetta, avocats, and by J. Grayston, Solicitor,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being:

European Parliament,

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Ninth Chamber),

composed of K. Jürimäe, President of the Chamber, M. Vilaras (Rapporteur) and D. Šváby, Judges,

Advocate General: P. Pikamäe,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the written procedure,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to give a decision by reasoned order, in accordance with Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court,

makes the following

Order

1. By his appeal, the appellant, Mr João Miguel Barata, seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 20 November 2018, Barata v Parliament (T‑854/16, not published, EU:T:2018:809; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which it dismissed Mr Barata’s action seeking annulment, first, of the decision of the appointing authority of the European Parliament (‘the appointing authority’) of 29 January 2016 (‘the decision of 29 January 2016’), and of the appointing authority’s confirmatory decision of 29 March 2016 (‘the confirmatory decision’) not to include the appellant on the list of officials authorised to take part in the training programme in 2015 under the 2015 certification exercise, second, ...