Дело C-646/11: 3F/Комисия, Съдебно решение от 24 януари 2013 г.

Текст

... inary examination stage – Commission decision not to raise objections – Action for annulment – Conditions for initiating the formal investigation procedure – Existence of doubts regarding the compatibility of the aid with the common market – Period for the examination)

In Case C‑646/11 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 8 December 2011,

Falles Fagligt Forbund (3F), formerly Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID), established in Copenhagen (Denmark), represented by P. Torbøl, advokat, S. Aparicio Hill, abogada, and V. Edwards, Solicitor,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Commission, represented by H. van Vliet and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,

defendant at first instance,

Kingdom of Denmark, represented by C. Vang and C. Thorning, acting as Agents,

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Eighth Chamber),

composed of E. Jarašiūnas, President of the Chamber, A. Ó Caoimh (Rapporteur) and C. Toader, Judges,

Advocate General: E. Sharpston,

Registrar: K. Malacek, Administrator,

having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 12 November 2012,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its appeal, Falles Fagligt Forbund (3F), formerly Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID) (‘3F’), the general trade union for workers in Denmark, asks the Court to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 27 September 2011 in Case T‑30/03 RENV 3F v ...