Дело C-70/12: Quinn Barlo и др./Комисия, Съдебно решение от 30 май 2013 г.

Текст

... t of reasons – Unlimited jurisdiction – General principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and equal treatment – Proportionality of the fine)

In Case C‑70/12 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 9 February 2012,

Quinn Barlo Ltd, established in Ballyconnell (Ireland),

Quinn Plastics NV, established in Geel (Belgium),

Quinn Plastics GmbH, established in Mayence (Germany),

represented by F. Wijckmans and M. Visser, advocaten,

appellants,

the other party to the proceedings being:

European Commission, represented by N. Khan and V. Bottka, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Seventh Chamber),

composed of G. Arestis, President of the Chamber, A. Arabadjiev and J.L. da Cruz Vilaça (Rapporteur), Judges,

Advocate General: M. Wathelet,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the written procedure,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By their appeal, Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV and Quinn Plastics GmbH (‘the appellants’) request that the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 November 2011 in Case T‑208/06 Quinn Barlo and Others v Commission (‘the judgment under appeal’) be set aside in part. By that judgment the General Court dismissed in part the appellants’ action for (i) annulment of Articles 1 and 2 of Commission Decision C(2006) 2098 final of 31 May 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] ...