Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2023 г.

Текст

... tify the earlier trade mark in the notice of opposition – Conditions for admissibility of the opposition)

In Case T‑758/21,

Dorsum Informatikai Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Zrt., established in Budapest (Hungary), represented by G. Hajdu, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and D. Hanf, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

id Quantique SA, established in Carouge (Switzerland), represented by F. Nielsen, lawyer,

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of D. Spielmann, President, R. Mastroianni and M. Brkan (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Dorsum Informatikai Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Zrt., seeks alteration or annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2021 (Case R 189/2021-1) (‘the contested decision’).

Background to the dispute

2. On 15 May 2019, the intervener, id Quantique SA, filed with EUIPO an application for registration of an ...