Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2023 г.

Текст

... pitalisation – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Identification of the relevant market – Significant market power – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons)

In Case T‑737/20,

Ryanair DAC, established in Swords (Ireland), represented by E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis and D. Pérez de Lamo, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Commission, represented by L. Flynn, C. Georgieva and S. Noë, acting as Agents,

defendant,

supported by

Republic of Latvia, represented by K. Pommere and J. Davidoviča, acting as Agents,

and by

Air Baltic Corporation AS, established in Riga (Latvia), represented by J. Ysewyn, lawyer,

interveners,

THE GENERAL COURT (Tenth Chamber),

composed, at the time of the deliberations, of A. Kornezov, President, E. Buttigieg (Rapporteur) and G. Hesse, Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to ...