Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2022 г.

Текст

... rd to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition – Competition eligibility requirements – Insufficient professional experience – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Rules on languages – Equal treatment)

In Case T‑624/20,

MV, represented by G. Pandey, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Commission, represented by T. Lilamand and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents,

defendant,

supported by

Council of the European Union, represented by M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents,

intervener,

THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber),

composed, at the time of the deliberations, of R. da Silva Passos, President, I. Reine (Rapporteur) and M. Sampol Pucurull, Judges,

Registrar: P. Cullen, Administrator,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

further to the hearing on 9 March 2022,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, MV, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the competition selection board of 29 October 2019 rejecting his request for review of the decision of 5 June 2019 not to admit him to the next stage of Open Competition EPSO/AD/364/19 – Security Officers (AD 7) (‘the contested decision’), the notice of competition and the draft list of officials selected to take part in the competition and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by him as a result of those acts.

Background to the dispute

2. On 24 January 2019, notice of competition EPSO/AD/364/19 – Security Officers (AD 7) (‘the notice of competition’) was ...