Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2019 г.

Текст

In Case T‑491/18,

Vafo Praha s.r.o., established in Chrášt’any (Czech Republic), represented by M. Vojáček, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by S. Bonne and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Susanne Rutzinger-Kurpas, residing in Spiegelau (Germany), represented by F. Lichtnecker, lawyer,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 (Case R 264/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Vafo Praha and Ms Rutzinger-Kurpas,

THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber),

composed of S. Frimodt Nielsen, President, V. Kreuschitz (Rapporteur) and N. Półtorak, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 14 August 2018,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 31 October 2018,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 25 October 2018,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within 3 weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment