Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Infringement of procedural rights – 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection – 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Article 30 TFEU – Article 110 TFEU – Body of consistent evidence)

In Case T‑300/19,

Achema AB, established in Jonava (Lithuania),

Lifosa AB, established in Kedainiai (Lithuania),

represented by E. Righini and N. Solárová, lawyers,

applicants,

v

European Commission, represented by K. Herrmann and P. Němečková, acting as Agents,

defendant,

supported by

Republic of Lithuania, represented by K. Dieninis and R. Dzikovič, acting as Agents,

intervener,

APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 9209 final of 8 January 2019 on State aid SA.45765 (2018/NN), concerning an aid scheme implemented by the Republic of Lithuania in support of producers of electricity from renewable energy sources (OJ 2019 C 61, p. 1),

THE GENERAL COURT (Tenth Chamber),

composed of A. Kornezov (Rapporteur), President, E. Buttigieg and K. Kowalik-Bańczyk, Judges,

Registrar: J. Palacio González, Administrator,

having regard to the written part of the procedure and further to the hearing on 9 October 2020,

gives the following

Judgment

I. Background to the dispute

1. On 27 January 2016, the applicants in the present case, Achema AB and Lifosa AB, as well as Orlen Lietuva AB and the Lithuanian Confederation of Industrialists lodged a formal complaint with the European Commission (‘the 2016 complaint’) concerning, inter alia, alleged ...