Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... o 1907/2006 – Inclusion of phenanthrene on that list – Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Weight of evidence determination – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard)

In Case T‑177/19,

Exxonmobil Petroleum & Chemical BVBA, established in Antwerp (Belgium), represented by A. Kołtunowska and A. Bartl, lawyers,

applicant,

supported by

European Petroleum Refiners Association, established in Brussels (Belgium), represented by J.-P. Montfort and T. Delille, lawyers,

intervener,

v

European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), represented by W. Broere, C. Buchanan and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents, and by S. Raes, lawyer,

defendant,

supported by

French Republic, represented by A.-L. Desjonquères, E. Leclerc, T. Stehelin and W. Zemamta, acting as Agents,

intervener,

APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of ECHA Decision ED/88/2018 of 19 December 2018, in so far as it places phenanthrene on the list of substances identified as being of very high concern provided for in Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3),

THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber),

composed of J. Svenningsen, President, T. Pynnä and ...