Дело C-374/13: Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones/СХВП, Определение от 10 април 2014 г.

Текст

... in), represented by J. Carbonell Callicó, abogado,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent,

defendant at first instance,

MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG, established in Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by J.-C. Plate, Rechtsanwalt,

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, S. Rodin (Rapporteur) and F. Biltgen, Judges,

Advocate General: P. Mengozzi,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to give its decision by reasoned order, in accordance with Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice,

makes the following

Order

Grounds

1. By its appeal, Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones SL (‘Metropolis’) seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T‑284/11 Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones v OHIM — MIP Metro (METROINVEST) EU:T:2013:218 (‘the judgment under appeal’), by which that court dismissed its action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 March 2011 (Case R 954/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (‘MIP’) and Metropolis concerning an application for registration of the word sign ‘METROINVEST’ as a Community trade mark (‘the contested decision’).

Legal context

2. Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 ...