Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2017 г.

Текст

... x word marks FAIR & LOVELY — Decision on the appeal — Article 64(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Right to be heard — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Rule 20(7)(c) and Rule 50(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Legitimate expectations — Misuse of powers — Manifest errors of assessment)

In Case T‑811/14,

Unilever NV, established in Rotterdam (Netherlands), represented by A. Fox, Solicitor,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Hanf and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Technopharma Ltd, established in London (United Kingdom), represented by C. Scott, Barrister,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2014 (Case R 1004/2013‑4), relating to opposition proceedings between Technopharma and Unilever,

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of H. Kanninen, E. Buttigieg (Rapporteur) and L. Calvo-Sotelo Ibáñez-Martín, Judges,

Registrar: I. Dragan, Administrator,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 8 December 2014,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 14 April 2015,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 1 April 2015,

having regard to the reply lodged at the Court Registry on 6 July 2015,

further to the hearing on 23 September 2016,

gives the following

Judgment

Background ...