Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

... usal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

In Case T‑5/19,

Clatronic International GmbH, established in Kempen (Germany), represented by O. Löffel, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,

defendant,

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 October 2018 (Case R 504/2018-1), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark PROFI CARE,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of D. Spielmann, acting as President, Z. Csehi (Rapporteur) and O. Spineanu-Matei, Judges,

Registrar: A. Juhász-Tóth, Administrator,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 4 January 2019,

having regard to the response lodged at the Court Registry on 26 March 2019,

having regard to the designation of another Judge to complete the Chamber as one of its Members was prevented from acting,

further to the hearing on 6 November 2019,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. On 3 July 2017, the applicant, Clatronic International GmbH, obtained international registration No 1372358 designating the European Union from the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). On 26 October 2017, that international registration was notified to the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) under Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the ...