Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

In Case T‑190/20,

Almea Ltd, established in London (United Kingdom), represented by R. Furneaux and E. Humphreys, Solicitors,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by J. Mrozowski, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Sanacorp Pharmahandel GmbH, established in Planegg (Germany), represented by I.‑M. Helbig, S. Rengshausen and S. Cobet-Nüse, lawyers,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 January 2020 (Case R 246/2019‑2), relating to opposition proceedings between Sanacorp Pharmahandel and Almea,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of A. Marcoulli, President, S. Frimodt Nielsen (Rapporteur) and J. Schwarcz, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 7 April 2020,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 23 July 2020,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 3 August 2020,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks following service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules ...