Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2024 г.

Текст

... ple of sound administration – Article 22 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

In Case T‑22/22,

AL, represented by R. Rata, lawyer,

applicant,

v

Council of the European Union, represented by M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents,

defendant,

THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber),

composed of R. da Silva Passos, President, N. Półtorak (Rapporteur) and T. Pynnä, Judges,

Registrar: A. Marghelis, Administrator,

having regard to the order of 31 March 2022, AL v Council (T‑22/22 R, not published, EU:T:2022:200),

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

further to the hearing on 14 September 2023, at which the Court decided to dismiss the request for a stay of the proceedings brought by the applicant,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, AL, seeks annulment of the decision of 27 September 2021 of the Council of the European Union, by which he was removed from his post (‘the contested decision’).

I. Background to the dispute

2. The applicant has been an official in the General Secretariat of the Council since 1 December 2007.

3. Following a request made by the applicant, various allowances were granted to him between 2009 and 2019 in so far as his mother and four other persons were treated as dependent ...