Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2025 г.

Текст

... of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 )

In Case T‑327/24,

Techtex SRL, established in Cicârlău (Romania), represented by B. Bularda, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Gája, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Adina Alberts, residing in Bucharest (Romania), represented by V. Roș and A. Livădariu, lawyers,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of M.J. Costeira (Rapporteur), President, M. Kancheva and P. Zilgalvis, Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Techtex SRL, seeks, in essence, the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 April 2024 (Case R 763/2023-4) (‘the contested decision’).

I. Background to the dispute

2. On 15 October 2021, the intervener, Ms Adina Alberts, filed with EUIPO an application for a declaration of invalidity of the EU trade mark registered following an application filed on 4 April 2020 for the ...