Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2025 г.

Текст

... rks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law )

In Case T‑374/24,

AirPlus International GmbH, established in Neu-Isenburg (Germany), represented by R. Kunze, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by E. Markakis, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO being

Irene Comeig Ramírez, residing in Valencia (Spain),

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of R. Mastroianni, President, T. Tóth and S.L. Kalėda (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

makes the following

Order

1. By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, AirPlus International GmbH, seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 May 2024 (Case R 2171/2023-2) (‘the contested decision’).

Background to the dispute

2. On 17 April 2019, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, Ms Irene Comeig Ramírez, filed with EUIPO an application for registration of an EU trade mark in respect of ...