Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2024 г.

Текст

... invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

In Cases T‑334/23 to T‑337/23,

Isabel Nehera, residing in Sutton, Ontario (Canada),

Natacha Sehnal, residing in Montferrier-sur-Lez (France),

Jean-Henri Nehera, residing in Burnaby, British Columbia (Canada),

represented by W. Woll, lawyer,

applicants,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Gája, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Ladislav Zdút, residing in Bratislava (Slovakia), represented by Y. Echevarría García, lawyer,

THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber),

composed of K. Kowalik-Bańczyk (Rapporteur), President, E. Buttigieg and G. Hesse, Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the actions without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By their actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants, Ms Isabel Nehera, Ms Natacha Sehnal and Mr Jean-Henri Nehera, seek annulment of the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 April 2023 (Cases R 1216/2020-4 to R 1219/2020-4) (‘the contested decisions’).

Background to the dispute

2. ...