Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2025 г.

Текст

... ation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Act not open to challenge – Incorrect designation of the defendant – Statement of position – End of the failure to act – Partial inadmissibility – Application of a declaratory nature – Application for directions to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction )

In Case T‑261/24,

Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB, established in Klaipėda (Lithuania), represented by V. Nikitinas and A. Staševskaja, lawyers,

applicant,

v

Council of the European Union, represented by B. Driessen and L. Berger, acting as Agents,

and

European Commission, represented by M. Carpus-Carcea and J. Norris, acting as Agents,

THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber),

composed of R. da Silva Passos (Rapporteur), President, N. Półtorak and I. Reine, Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

having regard to the written part of the procedure, in particular the decision of 1 April 2025 to reserve the decision on the plea of inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction lodged by the Council until a ruling is given on the substance of the case,

makes the following

Order

1. By its action, the applicant, Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB, seeks, in essence, in the first place, under Article 263 TFEU: (i) the annulment, as regards the interpretation and definition of the term ‘transfer’, of the document of the European Commission, in the version thereof of 22 June 2022, entitled ‘Consolidated FAQs on the implementation of Council ...