Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

In Case T‑646/19,

eSky Group IP sp. z o.o., established in Warsaw (Poland), represented by P. Kurcman, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Gerhard Gröpel, residing in Passau (Germany), represented by N. Maenz, lawyer,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 (Case R 223/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Gröpel and eSky Group IP,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of A. Marcoulli, President, S. Frimodt Nielsen (Rapporteur) and R. Norkus, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 26 September 2019,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 23 January 2020,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 17 January 2020,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute