Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... lier EU word mark CFA and earlier EU figurative mark CFA CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention)

In Case T‑266/20,

Global Chartered Controller Institute SL, established in Alicante (Spain), represented by M. Pomares Caballero and T. Barber Giner, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by P. Villani and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

CFA Institute, established in Charlottesville, Virginia (United States), represented by G. Engels and W. May, lawyers,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 February 2020 (Case R 235/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between CFA Institute and Global Chartered Controller Institute,

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber),

composed of M.J. Costeira, President, M. Kancheva (Rapporteur) and B. Berke, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 8 May 2020,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 27 October 2020,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 21 October 2020,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and ...