Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2024 г.

Текст

... aine – Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Plea of illegality – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality)

In Case T‑235/22,

Russian Direct Investment Fund, established in Moscow (Russia), represented by K. Scordis and A. Gavrielides, lawyers,

applicant,

v

Council of the European Union, represented by A. Antoniadis and M. Bishop, acting as Agents,

defendant,

supported by

European Commission, represented by J.‑F. Brakeland, C. Giolito and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents,

intervener,

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of D. Spielmann (Rapporteur), President, R. Mastroianni and I. Gâlea, Judges,

Registrar: I. Kurme, Administrator,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

further to the hearing on 26 September 2023,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Russian Direct Investment Fund, seeks, in essence, the annulment of (i) Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/346 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 63, p. 5; ‘the contested decision’) and (ii) Council Regulation (EU) 2022/345 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 63, p. 1; ‘the contested regulation’) (together ‘the contested acts’), in so far as ...