Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2025 г.

Текст

... Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 )

In Case T‑371/24,

La Superquímica, SA, established in Barcelona (Spain), represented by D. Pellisé Urquiza and K. Bitton Fernández, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Monta Klebebandwerk GmbH, established in Immenstadt (Germany), represented by M. Hoffmann, lawyer,

THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber),

composed of P. Škvařilová-Pelzl, President, I. Nõmm and D. Kukovec (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

having regard to the conditional request for a hearing submitted by the applicant and the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the other parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, La Superquímica, SA, seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 May 2024 (Case R 2006/2023-2) (‘the contested decision’).

Background to the dispute

2. On 26 July 2018, the intervener, Monta Klebebandwerk GmbH, filed an ...