Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2022 г.

Текст

In Case T‑694/20,

Maria Alexandra Canisius, residing in Vienna (Austria), represented by H. Asenbauer, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by T. Frydendahl and D. Hanf, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Beiersdorf AG, established in Hamburg (Germany), represented by J. Fuhrmann and V. von Bomhard, lawyers,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 September 2020 (Case R 2233/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Beiersdorf and Ms Canisius,

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber),

composed of M.J. Costeira, President, T. Perišin and P. Zilgalvis (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 18 November 2020,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 25 February 2021,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 5 March 2021,

having regard to the reassignment of the case to the Ninth Chamber and to a new Judge-Rapporteur,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) ...