Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... ce of the author of the act)

In Case T‑689/20,

HB, represented by C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Investment Bank (EIB), represented by G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer,

defendant,

ACTION under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking annulment of the decision of the EIB of 27 April 2020 terminating the applicant’s employment,

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of H. Kanninen, President, N. Półtorak (Rapporteur) and M. Stancu, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. The applicant, HB, a former member of staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB), entered the service of the EIB on 1 February 2011 as an administrative assistant assigned to the department dedicated to the Jaspers initiative (‘the department in question’).

2. Under the terms of the contract which she signed on 21 December 2010, the applicant was initially recruited for a period of three years. On 24 July 2013, the applicant’s fixed-term contract was extended, by addendum, for a further period of three years, from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2017.

3. On 29 September 2016, the applicant was offered a permanent contract, as of 1 February 2017. It was stated in that contract that, without prejudice to the other grounds for termination, it would expire automatically at the end of the notice period given by the EIB upon termination or alteration of the bank’s ...