Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2022 г.

Текст

... – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability)

In Case T‑536/20,

LU, represented by B. Maréchal, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Investment Bank (EIB), represented by G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers,

defendant,

APPLICATION pursuant to Article 270 TFEU and to Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, in essence, annulment of the final report issued by the Dignity at Work Panel on 13 May 2020 and of the decision of the President of the EIB of 26 May 2020 rejecting the harassment complaint lodged by the applicant and, second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant,

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of H. Kanninen, President, M. Jaeger (Rapporteur) and N. Półtorak, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. The applicant, LU, took up his duties at the European Investment Bank (EIB) on 16 October 2009 as a [confidential] in the [confidential] Division.

2. On 16 June 2011, he was assigned to the [confidential] Directorate, which includes the [confidential] Directorate.

3. As a [confidential] in the [confidential] Directorate (the director of which was A), the ...