Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility)

In Case T‑482/20,

LG, and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex, represented by A. Sigal and M. Teder, lawyers,

applicants,

v

European Commission, represented by T. Adamopoulos and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents,

defendant,

APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision that the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) allegedly adopted tacitly in an email of 26 May 2020, by which OLAF allegedly rejected the claim for protection of the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and their clients regarding communications between the applicants and their lawyers,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of A. Marcoulli, President, S. Frimodt Nielsen (Rapporteur) and J. Schwarcz, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

makes the following

Order

Background to the dispute

1. From 16 to 20 September 2019, in the context of an investigation, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) carried out an on-the-spot check at the offices of the applicants in Estonia and Germany. The purpose of the check was to investigate suspicions of fraud or any other irregularity affecting the EU’s financial interests committed by one of the applicants and the persons or entities linked to it, in relation to, in particular, three EU projects from which the applicants had benefited.

2. In emails of 17 and 19 September 2019, OLAF listed several categories of documents and materials (both physical and electronic) to ...