Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2021 г.

Текст

... ks PANDA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

In Case T‑191/20,

FCA Italy SpA, established in Turin (Italy), represented by F. Jacobacci and E. Truffo, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Christoph Bettag, residing in Aachen (Germany), represented by M. Metzner, A. Hönninger and M. Zeis, lawyers,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2020 (Case R 1483/2019‑5), relating to opposition proceedings between FCA Italy and Mr Bettag,

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber),

composed of M.J. Costeira, President, M. Kancheva and T. Perišin (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 9 April 2020,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 16 July 2020,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 3 September 2020,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,

...