Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2010 г.

Текст

... icable rules – Heading ‘Potential’ – Appraisal procedure – Attestation procedure)

In Case T‑160/08 P,

APPEAL against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 21 February 2008 in Case F‑31/07 Putterie-De-Beukelaer v Commission [2008] ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside,

European Commission, represented by C. Berardis-Kayser and K. Hermann, acting as Agents,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being

Françoise Putterie-De-Beukelaer, an official of the European Commission, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by É. Boigelot, lawyer,

applicant at first instance,

THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber),

composed of M. Jaeger, President, A.W.H. Meij, M. Vilaras, N.J. Forwood and M.E. Martins Ribeiro (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: C. Kristensen, Administrator,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By its appeal, brought under Article 9 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Commission of the European Communities is seeking to have set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 February 2008 in Case F-31/07 Putterie-De-Beukelaer v Commission [2008] ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 (‘the judgment under appeal’), whereby the Tribunal annulled Ms Françoise Putterie-De-Beukelaer’s career development report for the period 1 January to 31 December 2005 (‘the 2005 CDR’) in so far as her potential to carry out the functions of category B* is not recognised therein (‘the contested decision’).

Legal context

2. Under Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Economic Community (the ‘Staff ...