Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2020 г.

Текст

... rst paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations – Article 38 of the Staff Regulations – Refusal to extend a secondment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Rights of the defence)

In Case T‑131/20,

IR, represented by S. Pappas and A. Pappas, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Commission, represented by T. Bohr and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents,

defendant,

APPLICATION under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of the Commission of 2 July 2019 rejecting the request of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) that the applicant’s secondment within its services should be extended for an additional year and, second, of the decision of 23 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint brought against the decision of 2 July 2019,

THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),

composed of H. Kanninen (Rapporteur), President, O. Porchia and M. Stancu, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

gives the following

Judgment

Background to the dispute

1. The applicant, IR, has been an official of the European Commission since April 2003. He is assigned to the Directorate-General (DG) ‘Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion’ located in Brussels (Belgium).

2. The applicant has been a widower since 2012 and himself raises his only son, who was 14 years old on the day on which the present action was brought. The applicant’s son has been affected by [confidential] since birth. In 2014, a Greek health institution established that the child had a total disability rate ...