Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2025 г.

Текст

... alidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law )

In Case T‑102/24,

Qx World Kft., established in Budapest (Hungary), represented by Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by V. Ruzek, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.), established in Szigetszentmiklós (Hungary), represented by V. Łuszcz, C. Sár and É. Ulviczki, lawyers,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of M.J. Costeira (Rapporteur), President, M. Kancheva and P. Zilgalvis, Judges,

Registrar: V. Di Bucci,

makes the following

Order

1. By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, QX World Kft., seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 December 2023 (Case R 8/2022-4) (‘the contested decision’).

Background to the dispute

2. On 6 November 2017, the applicant filed with EUIPO an application for a declaration of invalidity of the ...