Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2017 г.

Текст

... Directors-General and heads of service — Omission of the appellants’ names — Obligation to state reasons — No error of law — No distortion of the evidence — Application for the recusal of a judge)

In Case T-667/16 P,

APPEAL brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 20 July 2016, Adriaen and Others v Commission (F‑113/15, EU:F:2016:162), and seeking to have that judgment set aside,

Pieter De Meyer, residing in Brussels (Belgium), and the other appellants whose names appear in the annex, represented by R. Rata, lawyer,

appellants,

the other party to the proceedings being

European Commission, represented initially by G. Berscheid, C. Berardis-Kayser and A.-A. Gilly, and subsequently by Berscheid, G. Gattinara and Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents,

defendant at first instance,

THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber),

composed of M. Jaeger (Rapporteur), President, H. Kanninen and D. Gratsias, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By their appeal lodged under Article 9 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the appellants, Mr Pieter De Meyer and the eight other appellants whose names appear in the annex, seek to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Single Judge) of 20 July 2016, Adriaen and Others v Commission (F‑113/15, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:F:2016:162), by which the General Court dismissed their claim seeking ...