Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2019 г.

Текст

... or suspension of operation — No urgency)

In Case T‑687/18 R,

Pilatus Bank plc, established in Ta’Xbiex (Malta), represented by O.H. Behrends, M. Kirchner and L. Feddern, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Central Bank (ECB), represented by E. Yoo, M. Puidokas and A. Karpf, acting as Agents,

defendant,

APPLICATION based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation of an act of the European Central Bank contained in an email of 10 September 2018 by which the ECB required that any communication to it by the applicant be made either through the person appointed by the Malta Financial Services Authority or with the approval of that person,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE GENERAL COURT

makes the following

Order

Background to the dispute, procedure and forms of order sought by the parties

1. The applicant, Pilatus Bank plc, used to be a less significant credit institution within the meaning of Article 6(4) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63) and, as such, subject to direct prudential supervision by the Malta Financial Services Authority (the ‘MFSA’).

2. On 21 March 2018, the MFSA ordered the applicant to terminate its operations.

3. On 22 March 2018, the MFSA appointed Mr Lawrence Connell as the so-called Competent Person in order to ‘take control of the Bank’ (the ‘Competent Person’).

4. In the context of an exchange ...