Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2019 г.

Текст

In Case T‑34/18,

Giove Gas Srl, established in Tarquinia (Italy), represented by A. Bergonzini and F. Dinelli, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by J. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz, established in Paris (France), represented by D. Régnier, lawyer,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2017 (Case R 1271/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz and Giove Gas,

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber),

composed of S. Gervasoni, President, K. Kowalik-Bańczyk (Rapporteur) and C. Mac Eochaidh, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 24 January 2018,

having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 1 August 2018,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 1 August 2018,

having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure ...