Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2022 г.

Текст

... d – Decision not to renew – Action for annulment and for damages – Actionable measure – Manifest inadmissibility)

In Case T‑534/21,

VP, represented by L. Levi, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), represented by A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck, L. Burguin and T. Payan, lawyers,

defendant,

THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber),

composed of S. Gervasoni, President, L. Madise (Rapporteur) and J. Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

makes the following

Order

1. By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, VP, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 2 March 2021 and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Facts and procedure

2. The applicant was recruited by Cedefop on 16 November 2007 as a member of the temporary staff to perform the duties of legal adviser. Her contract was renewed until 15 November 2017.

3. On 10 March 2017, the applicant submitted to the Director of Cedefop a request for renewal of her contract, on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), applicable to members of the temporary staff under Article 46 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union.

4. On 12 May 2017, the Director of Cedefop rejected the request, informing ...