Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2023 г.

Текст

... with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery)

In Cases T‑858/16 and T‑867/16,

Dow Silicones Corp., formerly Dow Corning Corp., established in Midland, Michigan (United States),

Dow Silicones Belgium, formerly Dow Corning Europe, established in Seneffe (Belgium),

applicants in Case T‑858/16,

Vinventions, formerly Nomacorc, established in Thimister-Clermont (Belgium),

applicant in Case T‑867/16,

represented by H. Gilliams and L. Goossens, lawyers,

v

European Commission, represented by P.‑J. Loewenthal, B. Stromsky and F. Tomat, acting as Agents,

defendant,

THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber, Extended Composition),

composed of A. Marcoulli, President, S. Frimodt Nielsen, V. Tomljenović (Rapporteur), R. Norkus and W. Valasidis, Judges,

Registrar: S. Spyropoulos, Administrator,

having regard to the written part of the procedure, in particular:

– the decision of 16 February 2018 to stay the proceedings pending the decisions closing the proceedings in the cases that gave rise to the judgment of 14 February 2019, Belgium and Magnetrol International v Commission (T‑131/16 and T‑263/16, EU:T:2019:91), and to the judgment of 16 September 2021, Commission v Belgium and Magnetrol International (C‑337/19 P, EU:C:2021:741),

– the decision of 26 April 2022 to resume the proceedings,

– the written questions put by the Court to the parties and their replies to those questions,

having regard to the order of the President of the Second Chamber, Extended Composition, of 21 December 2022 joining Cases T‑278/16, T‑370/16, T‑373/16, T‑420/16, T‑467/16, T‑637/16, T‑681/16, T‑858/16 and ...