Дело C-49/25: Puma/EUIPO, Определение от 22 май 2025 г.

Текст

... e of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed )

In Case C‑49/25 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 27 January 2025,

Puma SE, established in Herzogenaurach (Germany), represented by M. Schunke and P. Trieb, Rechtsanwälte,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),

defendant at first instance,

Puma Srl, established in Settimo Milanese (Italy),

intervener at first instance,

THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed),

composed of T. von Danwitz, Vice-President of the Court, N. Jääskinen and R. Frendo (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona,

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, Puma SE asks the Court of Justice to set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 14 November 2024, Puma v EUIPO – Puma (puma acoustics) (T‑69/24, EU:T:2024:835; ‘the order under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed Puma’s action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 December 2023 (Case R 1400/2021-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Puma SE and Puma Srl.

The request that the appeal be allowed to proceed

2. Under the first ...