Дело C-206/15: Sun Mark и Bulldog Energy Drink/Red Bull, Определение от 24 ноември 2015 г.

Текст

... e Board of Appeal’ who failed to lodge a response before the General Court — No status as intervener before the General Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

In Case C‑206/15 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 14 April 2015,

Sun Mark Ltd, established in Greenford (United Kingdom),

Bulldog Energy Drink Ltd, established in Stanmore (United Kingdom),

represented by T. Sampson, Barrister,

appellants,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Red Bull GmbH, established in Fuschl am See (Austria),

applicant at first instance

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM),

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Tenth Chamber),

composed of F. Biltgen, President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur) and E. Levits, Judges,

Advocate General: M. Wathelet,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having regard to the decision taken, after hearing the Advocate General, to give a decision on the action by reasoned order, pursuant to Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice,

makes the following

Order

1. By their appeal, Sun Mark Ltd (‘Sun Mark’) and Bulldog Energy Drink Ltd (‘Bulldog Energy Drink’) seek the setting aside of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Red Bull v OHIM — Sun Mark (BULLDOG) (T‑78/13, EU:T:2015:72) (‘the judgment under appeal’), by which it annulled the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ...