Дело C-717/20: Karpeta-Kovalyova/Комисия, Определение от 6 юли 2021 г.

Текст

... ussels prior to the recruitment – Definition of the place of recruitment and the centre of interests – Refusal to grant the appellant the expatriation allowance and related benefits – Appeal manifestly unfounded)

In Case C‑717/20 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 28 December 2020,

Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova, residing in Woluwe-Saint-Pierre (Belgium), represented by S. Pappas, avocat,

appellant,

the other party to the proceedings being:

European Commission,

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Eighth Chamber),

composed of N. Wahl, President of the Chamber, L.S. Rossi (Rapporteur) and J. Passer, Judges,

Advocate General: J. Kokott,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to give a decision by reasoned order, pursuant to Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice,

makes the following

Order

1. By her appeal, Ms Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 October 2020, Karpeta-Kovalyova v Commission (T‑249/19, not published, EU:T:2020:490; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed as unfounded her action for annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 14 June 2018 refusing her entitlement to the expatriation allowance, the daily subsistence allowance, the installation allowance, and the repayment of travel expenses incurred in taking up employment and removal expenses.

The appeal

2. Pursuant to Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, where the appeal is, ...