Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2022 г.

Текст

... applicant – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Inadmissibility)

In Case T‑692/21,

AL, represented by R. Rata, lawyer,

applicant,

v

European Commission, represented by T. Bohr, J. Baquero Cruz and A.‑C. Simon, acting as Agents,

defendant,

THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber),

composed of R. da Silva Passos, President, N. Półtorak (Rapporteur) and T. Pynnä, Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

having regard to the written part of the procedure,

makes the following

Order

1. By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, AL, seeks, first, the annulment of (i) various acts adopted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in the context of an investigation concerning him and by which OLAF rejected, inter alia, two complaints lodged by him against the final report and recommendations made in that investigation, (ii) the European Commission’s note of 3 March 2021 by which the Commission had informed him of its intention to recover certain allowances that had been paid to him (‘the note of 3 March 2021’), (iii) the Commission decision of 22 March 2021 by which it decided to recover those allowances (‘the decision of 22 March 2021’), (iv) the Council of the European Union’s internal note of 22 January 2021 recommending the opening of disciplinary proceedings against him (‘the Council’s internal note’) and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage that he claims to have suffered as a consequence of the recovery of various sums from his salary during 2021 and of the alleged illegal conduct of the OLAF ...