Дело T-***/**: *****************, Определение от **.**.2025 г.

Текст

... p>In Case T‑658/24 R,

Warbud S.A., established in Warsaw (Poland), represented by K. Kuźma, M. Gajdek, W. Hartung and D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, lawyers,

applicant,

v

European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), represented by C. Carroll and R.-A. Popa, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer and L. Lence de Frutos, lawyers,

defendant,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE GENERAL COURT

having regard to the order of 13 February 2025, Warbud v Frontex (T‑658/24 R, not published),

makes the following

Order

1. By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant, Warbud S.A., requests, in the first place, suspension of operation of the decision of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), as notified on 23 October 2024 and 7 February 2025 in the award procedure bearing the reference FRONTEX/CD/1217/2021/RS – FRONTEX Permanent Premises, informing it that the tender it submitted had not been successful and that the framework agreement had been awarded to another tenderer and, in the second place, suspension of the signature of the framework agreement with the successful tenderer.

Background to the dispute and forms of order sought

2. On 12 July 2022, by a contract notice published in the supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2022 S 132), Frontex launched the award procedure bearing the reference Frontex/CD/1217/2021/RS, concerning the design and construction of Frontex’ permanent premises.

3. The procurement procedure was conducted in the form of a competitive dialogue and took place in three phases. In phase I, ...