Дело T-***/**: *****************, Съдебно решение от **.**.2024 г.

Текст

... ntex in the Central Mediterranean Sea on 30 July 2021 – Refusal to grant access – Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security – Obligation to state reasons)

In Case T‑205/22,

Marie Naass, residing in Berlin (Germany),

Sea-Watch eV, established in Berlin,

represented by I. Van Damme and A. Matthaiou, lawyers,

applicants,

v

European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), represented by R.‑A. Popa and H. Caniard, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer,

defendant,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of M.J. Costeira, President, M. Kancheva (Rapporteur) and U. Öberg, Judges,

Registrar: A. Marghelis, Administrator,

having regard to the written part of the procedure, in particular:

– the measure of organisation of procedure of 19 July 2023 and the replies of the parties at the hearing on 11 October 2023;

– the measure of inquiry of 19 July 2023 and Frontex’s replies lodged at the Registry of the General Court on 4 August and 27 October 2023,

further to the hearing on 11 October 2023,

gives the following

Judgment

1. By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants, Ms Marie Naass and Sea-Watch eV, seek annulment of Decision DGSC/TO/PAD-2021-00350 of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) of 7 February 2022 concerning a confirmatory application for access to documents (‘the contested decision’).

Background to the dispute

2. Frontex was established in 2004 and is currently governed by Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of ...