Дело C-573/11: ClientEarth/Съвет, Определение от 5 септември 2013 г.

Текст

... nifestly inadmissible – Grounds of the appeal manifestly unfounded)

In Case C‑573/11 P,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 10 November 2011,

ClientEarth, established in London (United Kingdom), represented by P. Kirch, avocat,

applicant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Council of the European Union, represented by C. Fekete and B. Driessen, acting as Agents,

defendant at first instance,

Kingdom of Denmark,

Republic of Finland,

Kingdom of Sweden,

interveners at first instance,

THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of M. Berger, President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet and E. Levits (Rapporteur), Judges,

Advocate General: N. Jääskinen,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to give a decision by reasoned order, pursuant to Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice,

makes the following

Order

1. By its appeal, ClientEarth seeks the setting aside of the order of the General Court of the European Union of 6 September 2011 in Case T‑452/10 ClientEarth v Council (‘the order under appeal’), by which that court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible its action seeking the annulment of the decision of the Council of 26 July 2010 refusing to grant it full access to an opinion of the Council’s Legal Service (Document No 6865/09) on the draft amendments by the European Parliament to the Commission’s proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May ...